Prediction of E. coli Concentrations in Agricultural Pond Waters: Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms

Stocker, Matthew D. and Pachepsky, Yakov A. and Hill, Robert L. (2022) Prediction of E. coli Concentrations in Agricultural Pond Waters: Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. ISSN 2624-8212

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/frai-04-768650/frai-04-768650.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/frai-04-768650/frai-04-768650.pdf - Published Version

Download (496kB)

Abstract

The microbial quality of irrigation water is an important issue as the use of contaminated waters has been linked to several foodborne outbreaks. To expedite microbial water quality determinations, many researchers estimate concentrations of the microbial contamination indicator Escherichia coli (E. coli) from the concentrations of physiochemical water quality parameters. However, these relationships are often non-linear and exhibit changes above or below certain threshold values. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been shown to make accurate predictions in datasets with complex relationships. The purpose of this work was to evaluate several ML models for the prediction of E. coli in agricultural pond waters. Two ponds in Maryland were monitored from 2016 to 2018 during the irrigation season. E. coli concentrations along with 12 other water quality parameters were measured in water samples. The resulting datasets were used to predict E. coli using stochastic gradient boosting (SGB) machines, random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithms. The RF model provided the lowest RMSE value for predicted E. coli concentrations in both ponds in individual years and over consecutive years in almost all cases. For individual years, the RMSE of the predicted E. coli concentrations (log10 CFU 100 ml−1) ranged from 0.244 to 0.346 and 0.304 to 0.418 for Pond 1 and 2, respectively. For the 3-year datasets, these values were 0.334 and 0.381 for Pond 1 and 2, respectively. In most cases there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the RMSE of RF and other ML models when these RMSE were treated as statistics derived from 10-fold cross-validation performed with five repeats. Important E. coli predictors were turbidity, dissolved organic matter content, specific conductance, chlorophyll concentration, and temperature. Model predictive performance did not significantly differ when 5 predictors were used vs. 8 or 12, indicating that more tedious and costly measurements provide no substantial improvement in the predictive accuracy of the evaluated algorithms.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: EP Archives > Multidisciplinary
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 20 Feb 2023 05:59
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2024 07:58
URI: http://research.send4journal.com/id/eprint/890

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item