Comparative Techno-Economic and Exergetic Analysis of Circulating and Dual Bed Biomass Gasification Systems

Silva Ortiz, Pablo and Maier, Simon and Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe and Pinto Mariano, Adriano and Maciel Filho, Rubens and Posada, John (2021) Comparative Techno-Economic and Exergetic Analysis of Circulating and Dual Bed Biomass Gasification Systems. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 3. ISSN 2673-2718

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/2/package-entries/fceng-03-727068-r1/fceng-03-727068.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/2/package-entries/fceng-03-727068-r1/fceng-03-727068.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)

Abstract

In this work, the techno-economic and exergy analyses of two gasification technologies with integration into heat and power combined cycles are presented: i). Circulating fluidized bed (CFB) and ii). Dual fluidized bed (DFB) systems. As feedstock, lignocellulosic biomass (sugarcane bagasse, SCB) was considered. The gasification process of the fluidized-bed systems (circulating and dual bed) and the syngas conversion were performed using Aspen Plus® software. The process design includes biomass drying and gasification, syngas cleaning, combustion, power generation, and heat recovery. The SCB-DFB system has the lowest irreversibility rate and, as a result, the highest overall performance and power generation (achieving 32% in the gasification system and 53% of exergy efficiency when coupled with the combined cycle). From the techno-economic assessment, the SCB-DFB system has the lowest total production costs per unit of energy. Hence, the dual fluidized bed systems could be a more competitive technology for the agro-industrial sector to generate power from lignocellulosic materials.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: EP Archives > Chemical Science
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2023 05:33
Last Modified: 10 Jul 2024 13:14
URI: http://research.send4journal.com/id/eprint/666

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item